[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114031658.pnbf7uiqqgiq3uk7@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:46:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, andersson@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, johan@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
On 09-11-22, 16:47, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Is the cpufreq_get() API expected
> to return something close to what was set or is it expected to return the
> real set h/w value if and when possible.
The real frequency the hardware is running at.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists