[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114083207.49d2274f.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:32:07 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Anthony DeRossi <ajderossi@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the
vfio-fixes tree
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:35:39 -0400
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 03:37:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 7fdba0011157 ("vfio: Fix container device registration life cycle")
> >
> > from the vfio-fixes tree and commit:
> >
> > 55e16a188913 ("vfio: Move vfio_device driver open/close code to a function")
> >
> > from the iommufd tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I just used the latter version since it seems to
> > incorporate the former change) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Yes, that is right, it is as Alex and I discussed
My plan is to merge back my fixes branch after it gets pulled into
v6.1-rc so the vfio-iommufd support can be re-based to avoid this for
v6.2. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists