[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3HHNbfrFrV841k8@B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:42:29 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, yinxin.x@...edance.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: fix missing xas_retry() in fscache mode
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 05:08:13PM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> The xarray iteration only holds RCU and thus may encounter
> XA_RETRY_ENTRY if there's process modifying the xarray concurrently.
> This will cause oops when referring to the invalid entry.
>
> Fix this by adding the missing xas_retry(), which will make the
> iteration wind back to the root node if XA_RETRY_ENTRY is encountered.
>
> Fixes: d435d53228dd ("erofs: change to use asynchronous io for fscache readpage/readahead")
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> ---
> fs/erofs/fscache.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> index fe05bc51f9f2..458c1c70ef30 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> @@ -75,11 +75,15 @@ static void erofs_fscache_rreq_unlock_folios(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> xas_for_each(&xas, folio, last_page) {
> - unsigned int pgpos =
> - (folio_index(folio) - start_page) * PAGE_SIZE;
> - unsigned int pgend = pgpos + folio_size(folio);
> + unsigned int pgpos, pgend;
> bool pg_failed = false;
>
> + if (xas_retry(&xas, folio))
> + continue;
> +
> + pgpos = (folio_index(folio) - start_page) * PAGE_SIZE;
> + pgend = pgpos + folio_size(folio);
> +
> for (;;) {
> if (!subreq) {
> pg_failed = true;
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists