[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cz9p4zj6.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:10:37 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/14/22 00:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> b1d36e73cc1c ("drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2)")
>>
>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>
>> 801543b2593b ("drm/i915: stop including i915_irq.h from i915_trace.h")
>>
>> from the drm-intel tree.
>
> This is weird, because the:
>
> b1d36e73cc1c ("drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2)")
>
> commit is in 6.1-rc1, so there can only be a conflict it 6.1-rc1 has not
> been back-merged into drm-intel yet ?
That's the reason it *is* a conflict, right?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists