[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202211151521.mY7mPh4Y-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:07:24 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: remove redundant pointer lp
Hi Colin,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on jejb-scsi/for-next linus/master v6.1-rc5 next-20221114]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Colin-Ian-King/scsi-lpfc-remove-redundant-pointer-lp/20221101-195936
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221101115657.48267-1-colin.i.king%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: remove redundant pointer lp
config: arm-randconfig-c002-20221114
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 463da45892e2d2a262277b91b96f5f8c05dc25d0)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/e11ce9b9f1589e7088f17b72cd4df1c2c0bbb1d1
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Colin-Ian-King/scsi-lpfc-remove-redundant-pointer-lp/20221101-195936
git checkout e11ce9b9f1589e7088f17b72cd4df1c2c0bbb1d1
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/scsi/lpfc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c:38:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:850:19: warning: field portName within 'struct _ADISC' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _ADISC' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name portName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:851:19: warning: field nodeName within 'struct _ADISC' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _ADISC' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name nodeName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:881:19: warning: field FportName within 'struct _FAN' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _FAN' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name FportName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:882:19: warning: field FnodeName within 'struct _FAN' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _FAN' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name FnodeName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:922:19: warning: field portName within 'struct _RNID' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _RNID' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name portName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:923:19: warning: field nodeName within 'struct _RNID' is less aligned than 'struct lpfc_name' and is usually due to 'struct _RNID' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
struct lpfc_name nodeName;
^
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:926:4: warning: field un within 'struct _RNID' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h:924:2)' and is usually due to 'struct _RNID' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
} un;
^
>> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c:9175:22: warning: variable 'pcmd' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct lpfc_dmabuf *pcmd;
^
8 warnings generated.
vim +/pcmd +9175 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9156
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9157 /**
3621a710a7dbb2 James Smart 2009-04-06 9158 * lpfc_els_rcv_farpr - Process an unsolicited farp response iocb
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9159 * @vport: pointer to a host virtual N_Port data structure.
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9160 * @cmdiocb: pointer to lpfc command iocb data structure.
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9161 * @ndlp: pointer to a node-list data structure.
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9162 *
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9163 * This routine processes Fibre Channel Address Resolution Protocol
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9164 * Response (FARPR) IOCB received as an ELS unsolicited event. It simply
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9165 * invokes the lpfc_els_rsp_acc() routine to the remote node to accept
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9166 * the FARP response request.
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9167 *
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9168 * Return code
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9169 * 0 - Successfully processed FARPR IOCB (currently always return 0)
e59058c44025d7 James Smart 2008-08-24 9170 **/
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9171 static int
2e0fef85e098f6 James Smart 2007-06-17 9172 lpfc_els_rcv_farpr(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_iocbq *cmdiocb,
2e0fef85e098f6 James Smart 2007-06-17 9173 struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp)
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9174 {
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 @9175 struct lpfc_dmabuf *pcmd;
b27cbd55495093 Bart Van Assche 2019-03-28 9176 uint32_t did;
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9177
3bea83b68d5447 James Smart 2022-02-24 9178 did = get_job_els_rsp64_did(vport->phba, cmdiocb);
d51cf5bd926c7d James Smart 2022-04-12 9179 pcmd = cmdiocb->cmd_dmabuf;
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9180
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9181 /* FARP-RSP received from DID <did> */
e8b62011d88d6f James Smart 2007-08-02 9182 lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_ELS,
e8b62011d88d6f James Smart 2007-08-02 9183 "0600 FARP-RSP received from DID x%x\n", did);
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9184 /* ACCEPT the Farp resp request */
51ef4c26891a73 James Smart 2007-08-02 9185 lpfc_els_rsp_acc(vport, ELS_CMD_ACC, cmdiocb, ndlp, NULL);
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9186
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9187 return 0;
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9188 }
dea3101e0a5c89 James Bottomley 2005-04-17 9189
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (196823 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists