[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221115102833.ahwnahrqstcs2eug@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:28:33 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 0/2] mv88e6xxx: Add MAB offload support
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:26:55AM +0100, netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-11-15 10:30, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 09:37:46PM +0100, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
> > > This patchset adds MAB [1] offload support in mv88e6xxx.
> > >
> > > Patch #1: Fix a problem when reading the FID needed to get the VID.
> > >
> > > Patch #2: The MAB implementation for mv88e6xxx.
> >
> > Just to be sure, this was tested with bridge_locked_port.sh, right?
>
> As I have the phy regression I have given notice of, that has simply not
> been possible. After maybe 50 resets it worked for me at a point
> (something to do with timing), and I tested it manually.
>
> When I have tried to run the selftests, I get errors related to the phy
> problem, which I have not been able to find a way around.
What PHY regression?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists