[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e058c1b9-7f57-11da-6ad1-6387604813c5@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:09:41 +0800
From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@...wei.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>, <clm@...com>,
<josef@...icpanda.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>
CC: <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>, <yanaijie@...wei.com>, <wqu@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] btrfs: add might_sleep() to some places in
update_qgroup_limit_item()
在 2022/11/16 6:48, Qu Wenruo 写道:
> Looks good.
>
> We may want to add more in other locations, but this is really a good
> start.
>
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
If I just add might_sleep() in btrfs_alloc_path() and
btrfs_search_slot(), is it reasonable?
Or just add might_sleep() to one place in update_qgroup_limit_item() ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists