linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 21/24] crypto: x86 - report used CPU features via module parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y3TIyAjV5i02W9z5@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:26:00 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>
Cc:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, ap420073@...il.com, ardb@...nel.org,
        David.Laight@...LAB.COM, ebiggers@...nel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/24] crypto: x86 - report used CPU features via
 module parameters

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:13:39PM -0600, Robert Elliott wrote:
> For modules that have multiple choices, add read-only module parameters
> reporting which CPU features a module is using.
> 
> The parameters show up as follows for modules that modify the behavior
> of their registered drivers or register additional drivers for
> each choice:
>     /sys/module/aesni_intel/parameters/using_x86_avx:1
>     /sys/module/aesni_intel/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/aria_aesni_avx_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_gfni:0
>     /sys/module/chacha_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/chacha_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx512:1
>     /sys/module/crc32c_intel/parameters/using_x86_pclmulqdq:1
>     /sys/module/curve25519_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_adx:1
>     /sys/module/libblake2s_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx512:1
>     /sys/module/libblake2s_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_ssse3:1
>     /sys/module/poly1305_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx:1
>     /sys/module/poly1305_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/poly1305_x86_64/parameters/using_x86_avx512:0
>     /sys/module/sha1_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx:1
>     /sys/module/sha1_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/sha1_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_shani:0
>     /sys/module/sha1_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_ssse3:1
>     /sys/module/sha256_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx:1
>     /sys/module/sha256_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/sha256_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_shani:0
>     /sys/module/sha256_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_ssse3:1
>     /sys/module/sha512_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx:1
>     /sys/module/sha512_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_avx2:1
>     /sys/module/sha512_ssse3/parameters/using_x86_ssse3:1

Isn't chacha missing?

However, what's the point of any of this? Who benefits from this info?
If something seems slow, I'll generally look at perf top, which provides
this same thing.

Also, "using" isn't quite correct. Some AVX2 machines will never use any
ssse3 instructions, despite the code being executable.

> 
> Delete the aesni_intel prints reporting those selections:
>     pr_info("AVX2 version of gcm_enc/dec engaged.\n");

This part I like.

> +module_param_named(using_x86_adx, curve25519_use_bmi2_adx.key.enabled.counter, int, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(using_x86_adx, "Using x86 instruction set extensions: ADX");

And BMI2, not just ADX.