[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166879995436.2970319.8402648264263746100.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 19:35:02 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Rafael Aquini <raquini@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: fix two bug about page table check
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:56:00 +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> Denys Vlasenko has reported two bug about page table check on arm64.
> On arm64, pmd_present() contains non-leaf pmd and invalid pmd too.
>
> When collapse hugepage, the pmd is non-leaf and should skip the check.
> Use pmd_leaf() instead of pmd_present().
>
> When split hugepage, the pmd will be marked as invalid and then populate.
> So we should decrease file_map_count when invalid pmd and then increase
> when populate the pmd. Add pmd_valid() check.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/5b47348fc0b1
I only merged the first patch in this series as Will had some questions
on the second patch (it does seem weird that the pud and pmd functions
are different w.r.t. the p*d_user() checks).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists