linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 tty-next 2/4] 8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add serial8250_pci_setup_port definition in 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2022 03:50:02 +0000
From:   <Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
To:     <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <Kumaravel.Thiagarajan@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        <jay.dolan@...esio.com>, <cang1@...e.co.uk>,
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <wander@...hat.com>,
        <etremblay@...tech-controls.com>, <jk@...abs.org>,
        <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>, <lukas@...ner.de>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 tty-next 2/4] 8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add
 serial8250_pci_setup_port definition in 8250_pcilib.c

> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 4:14 PM
> To: Tharunkumar Pasumarthi - I67821
> <Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tty-next 2/4] 8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add
> serial8250_pci_setup_port definition in 8250_pcilib.c
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> > > Don't you have a dependency issue here?
> >
> > Okay, I will explain the need for the changes done in commit description.
> 
> What I meant is that the 8250_pci patch should be _prerequisite_ to your
> stuff and not otherwise.

Hi Andy,
So, do you suggest having these changes done as first patch of the patchset prior to patches
specific for our driver?

Thanks,
Tharun Kumar P