[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3jGfO5wboXe66KB@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:05:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@...rochip.com
Cc: Kumaravel.Thiagarajan@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
macro@...am.me.uk, jay.dolan@...esio.com, cang1@...e.co.uk,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, wander@...hat.com,
etremblay@...tech-controls.com, jk@...abs.org,
biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
phil.edworthy@...esas.com, lukas@...ner.de,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, colin.i.king@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tty-next 2/4] 8250: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add
serial8250_pci_setup_port definition in 8250_pcilib.c
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 03:50:02AM +0000, Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@...rochip.com wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 4:14 PM
> > To: Tharunkumar Pasumarthi - I67821 <Tharunkumar.Pasumarthi@...rochip.com>
...
> > > > Don't you have a dependency issue here?
> > >
> > > Okay, I will explain the need for the changes done in commit description.
> >
> > What I meant is that the 8250_pci patch should be _prerequisite_ to your
> > stuff and not otherwise.
>
> Hi Andy,
> So, do you suggest having these changes done as first patch of the patchset prior to patches
> specific for our driver?
Yes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists