linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among underutilized actuators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2565d52-e75f-0320-6136-97b7953deda2@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sun, 20 Nov 2022 15:06:16 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@...gate.com>,
        Davide Zini <davidezini2@...il.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among
 underutilized actuators

On 11/20/22 12:29 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> 
>> Il giorno 10 nov 2022, alle ore 16:25, Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> Checking in on this series and what we can communicate to partners as to potential integration into Linux.  Is 6.1 viable?
> 
> Hi Arie,
> definitely too late for 6.1.
> 
> Jens, could you enqueue this for 6.2?  Unless Damien, or anybody else
> still sees issues to address.

Would be nice to get Damien's feedback on the series.

-- 
Jens Axboe