linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among underutilized actuators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:41:02 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@...gate.com>,
        Davide Zini <davidezini2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among
 underutilized actuators

On 11/21/22 07:06, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/22 12:29 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 10 nov 2022, alle ore 16:25, Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Checking in on this series and what we can communicate to partners as to potential integration into Linux.  Is 6.1 viable?
>>
>> Hi Arie,
>> definitely too late for 6.1.
>>
>> Jens, could you enqueue this for 6.2?  Unless Damien, or anybody else
>> still sees issues to address.
> 
> Would be nice to get Damien's feedback on the series.

I will try to have a look today.

> 

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research