[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c450045-c3b2-b16d-609d-810608949611@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:09:34 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] serial: bflb_uart: add Bouffalolab UART Driver
Hi,
On 20. 11. 22, 9:21, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Add the driver for Bouffalolab UART IP which is found in Bouffalolab
> SoCs such as bl808.
>
> UART driver probe will create path named "/dev/ttySx".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
...
> #define UART_FIFO_CONFIG_0 (0x80)
Superfluous parentheses.
...
> +static void bflb_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
> + struct ktermios *termios,
> + const struct ktermios *old)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 valt, valr, val;
> + unsigned int baud, min;
> +
> + valt = valr = 0;
Unneeded (see below).
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* set data length */
> + val = tty_get_char_size(termios->c_cflag) - 1;
> + valt |= (val << UART_CR_UTX_BIT_CNT_D_SFT);
Use =, not |=. Other than that, can FIELD_SET() be used, provided you
already define the constants using GENMASK()?
> +
> + /* calculate parity */
> + termios->c_cflag &= ~CMSPAR; /* no support mark/space */
> + if (termios->c_cflag & PARENB) {
> + valt |= UART_CR_UTX_PRT_EN;
> + if (termios->c_cflag & PARODD)
> + valr |= UART_CR_UTX_PRT_SEL;
This should be valt, IMO.
> + }
> +
> + valr = valt;
If not, this doesn't make sense to me.
> + /* calculate stop bits */
> + if (termios->c_cflag & CSTOPB)
> + val = 2;
> + else
> + val = 1;
> + valt |= (val << UART_CR_UTX_BIT_CNT_P_SFT);
> +
> + /* flow control */
> + if (termios->c_cflag & CRTSCTS)
> + valt |= UART_CR_UTX_CTS_EN;
> +
> + /* enable TX freerunning mode */
> + valt |= UART_CR_UTX_FRM_EN;
> +
> + valt |= UART_CR_UTX_EN;
> + valr |= UART_CR_URX_EN;
Why this is not the very first and only for valt and copied to valr above?
> +
> + wrl(port, UART_UTX_CONFIG, valt);
> + wrl(port, UART_URX_CONFIG, valr);
> +
> + min = port->uartclk / (UART_CR_UTX_BIT_PRD + 1);
> + baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, min, 4000000);
> +
> + val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk, baud) - 1;
> + val &= UART_CR_UTX_BIT_PRD;
> + val |= (val << 16);
> + wrl(port, UART_BIT_PRD, val);
> +
> + uart_update_timeout(port, termios->c_cflag, baud);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void bflb_uart_rx_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + unsigned char ch, flag;
Please use u8. (serial_core should too, but that's only on a TODO list yet)
> + unsigned long status;
Long? I think u32.
> +
> + while ((status = rdl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_1)) & UART_RX_FIFO_CNT_MSK) {
> + ch = rdl(port, UART_FIFO_RDATA) & UART_FIFO_RDATA_MSK;
> + flag = TTY_NORMAL;
Drop this flag completely and use the constant below directly.
> + port->icount.rx++;
> +
> + if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, ch))
> + continue;
> + uart_insert_char(port, 0, 0, ch, flag);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> + tty_flip_buffer_push(&port->state->port);
> + spin_lock(&port->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void bflb_uart_tx_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
Are you unable to use the TX helper? If so:
* why?
* use uart_advance_xmit() at least.
> + struct circ_buf *xmit = &port->state->xmit;
> + unsigned int pending, count;
> +
> + if (port->x_char) {
> + /* Send special char - probably flow control */
> + wrl(port, UART_FIFO_WDATA, port->x_char);
> + port->x_char = 0;
> + port->icount.tx++;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pending = uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit);
> + if (pending > 0) {
> + count = (rdl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_1) &
> + UART_TX_FIFO_CNT_MSK) >> UART_TX_FIFO_CNT_SFT;
> + if (count > pending)
> + count = pending;
> + if (count > 0) {
> + pending -= count;
> + while (count--) {
> + wrl(port, UART_FIFO_WDATA, xmit->buf[xmit->tail]);
> + xmit->tail = (xmit->tail + 1) & (UART_XMIT_SIZE - 1);
> + port->icount.tx++;
> + }
> + if (pending < WAKEUP_CHARS)
> + uart_write_wakeup(port);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (pending == 0)
> + bflb_uart_stop_tx(port);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t bflb_uart_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct uart_port *port = data;
> + u32 isr, val;
> +
> + isr = rdl(port, UART_INT_STS);
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_CLEAR, isr);
> +
> + isr &= ~rdl(port, UART_INT_MASK);
> +
> + spin_lock(&port->lock);
> +
> + if (isr & UART_URX_FER_INT) {
> + /* RX FIFO error interrupt */
> + val = rdl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_0);
> + if (val & UART_RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW)
> + port->icount.overrun++;
> +
> + val |= UART_RX_FIFO_CLR;
> + wrl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_0, val);
> + }
> +
> + if (isr & (UART_URX_FIFO_INT | UART_URX_RTO_INT)) {
> + bflb_uart_rx_chars(port);
> + }
> + if (isr & (UART_UTX_FIFO_INT | UART_UTX_END_INT)) {
> + bflb_uart_tx_chars(port);
> + }
Superfluous braces.
> +
> + spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> +
> + return IRQ_RETVAL(isr);
Can it happen that UART_INT_STS is nonzero and UART_INT_MASK is zero?
You'd cause "irqX: nobody cared" in that case.
> +}
> +
> +static void bflb_uart_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + port->type = PORT_BFLB;
> +
> + /* Clear mask, so no surprise interrupts. */
surprising?
> + val = rdl(port, UART_INT_MASK);
> + val |= UART_UTX_END_INT;
> + val |= UART_UTX_FIFO_INT;
> + val |= UART_URX_FIFO_INT;
> + val |= UART_URX_RTO_INT;
> + val |= UART_URX_FER_INT;
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_MASK, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int bflb_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(port->dev, port->irq, bflb_uart_interrupt,
> + IRQF_SHARED, port->name, port);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(port->dev, "fail to request serial irq %d, ret=%d\n",
> + port->irq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> +
> + val = rdl(port, UART_INT_MASK);
> + val |= 0xfff;
Can this be a defined macro too, please?
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_MASK, val);
> +
> + wrl(port, UART_DATA_CONFIG, 0);
> + wrl(port, UART_SW_MODE, 0);
> + wrl(port, UART_URX_RTO_TIMER, 0x4f);
Another magic constant.
> +
> + val = rdl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_1);
> + val &= ~UART_RX_FIFO_TH_MSK;
> + val |= BFLB_UART_RX_FIFO_TH << UART_RX_FIFO_TH_SFT;
FIELD_SET()?
> + wrl(port, UART_FIFO_CONFIG_1, val);
> +
> + /* Unmask RX interrupts now */
> + val = rdl(port, UART_INT_MASK);
> + val &= ~UART_URX_FIFO_INT;
> + val &= ~UART_URX_RTO_INT;
> + val &= ~UART_URX_FER_INT;
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_MASK, val);
> + val = rdl(port, UART_UTX_CONFIG);
> + val |= UART_CR_UTX_EN;
> + wrl(port, UART_UTX_CONFIG, val);
> + val = rdl(port, UART_URX_CONFIG);
> + val |= UART_CR_URX_EN;
> + wrl(port, UART_URX_CONFIG, val);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> +/*
> + * Interrupts are disabled on entering
> + */
> +static void bflb_uart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
> + u_int count)
> +{
> + struct uart_port *port = &bflb_uart_ports[co->index]->port;
> + u32 status, reg, mask;
> +
> + /* save then disable interrupts */
> + mask = rdl(port, UART_INT_MASK);
> + reg = -1;
You use 0xfff earlier, now 0xffffffff. Is that OK? Why not use the same
constant?
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_MASK, reg);
> +
> + /* Make sure that tx is enabled */
> + reg = rdl(port, UART_UTX_CONFIG);
> + reg |= UART_CR_UTX_EN;
> + wrl(port, UART_UTX_CONFIG, reg);
> +
> + uart_console_write(port, s, count, bflb_console_putchar);
> +
> + /* wait for TX done */
> + do {
> + status = rdl(port, UART_STATUS);
> + } while ((status & UART_STS_UTX_BUS_BUSY));
> +
> + /* restore IRQ mask */
> + wrl(port, UART_INT_MASK, mask);
> +}
regards,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists