[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8926859.ZlztnY0qrB@silver>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:16:10 +0100
From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] 9p/xen: check logical size for buffer size
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 3:31:41 AM CET Dominique Martinet wrote:
[...]
> > I made this change and tried the two patches together. Unfortunately I
> > get the following error as soon as I try to write a file:
> >
> > /bin/sh: can't create /mnt/file: Input/output error
> >
> >
> > Next I reverted the second patch and only kept this patch. With that, it
> > worked as usual. It looks like the second patch is the problem. I have
> > not investigated further.
>
> Thanks -- it's now obvious I shouldn't send patches without testing
> before bedtime...
> I could reproduce easily with virtio as well, this one was silly as well
> (>= instead of >). . . With another problem when zc requests get
> involved, as we don't actually allocate more than 4k for the rpc itself.
>
> If I adjust it to also check with the zc 'inlen' as follow it appears to
> work:
> https://github.com/martinetd/linux/commit/162015a0dac40eccc9e8311a5eb031596ad35e82
> But that inlen isn't actually precise, and trans_virtio (the only
> transport implementing zc rpc) actually takes some liberty with the
> actual sg size to better fit hardwre, so that doesn't really make
> sense either and we probably should just trust trans_virtio at this
> point?
>
> This isn't obvious, so I'll just drop this patch for now.
> Checking witih msize isn't any good but it can wait till we sort it out
> as transports now all already check this one way or another; I'd like to
> get the actual fixes out first.
>
> (Christian, if you have time to look at it and take over I'd appreciate
> it, but there's no hurry.)
OK, I'll look at this.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists