[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZUjcO3hDwibCL1qTiSiLPQVYo5FaH3rzxygUBBwVHTwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:38 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:39 AM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> wrote:
> If the system is restarted via kexec(), the peripherals do not start
> with a known state.
>
> If the previous system had enabled an IRQs we will receive unexected
> IRQs that can lock the system.
(...)
This is obviously the right thing to do, so I just applied this
patch for fixes. Any ACKs and reviewed-by can be added
while this is tested in linux-next.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists