linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:34:38 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:39 AM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> wrote:

> If the system is restarted via kexec(), the peripherals do not start
> with a known state.
>
> If the previous system had enabled an IRQs we will receive unexected
> IRQs that can lock the system.
(...)

This is obviously the right thing to do, so I just applied this
patch for fixes. Any ACKs and reviewed-by can be added
while this is tested in linux-next.

Yours,
Linus Walleij