linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/mbox: Add background operation handling machinery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221122094422.000032f0@Huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:44:22 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC:     <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <bwidawsk@...nel.org>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        <alison.schofield@...el.com>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        <a.manzanares@...sung.com>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/mbox: Add background operation handling
 machinery

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:48:04 -0800
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
> >> +/*
> >> + * Ensure that ->mbox_send() can run safely when a background
> >> + * command is running. If so, returns zero, otherwise -EBUSY.  
> >
> >As above, I'm not sure this is necessary given you should get
> >a sensible error code in response to any such message.
> >E.g. media disabled.  
> 
> So this is necessary to prevent mischief in the polling case
> where you can have windows where the driver is out of sync
> with the hardware - hw finishes async command but driver
> (sleeping poller) has not acknowledged this. In the irq case,
> yeah this would be redundant and not needed.
> 

Ok.  A worked example might be useful for where this matters
at a higher level.  For example, if there is no conflict at
the hardware level what goes wrong in the software as a result
of dropping the protection on the one that we haven't yet detected
as finished...

Jonathan


> Thanks,
> Davidlohr