[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3yhFWQ7NHMArO74@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:14:45 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rahul Tanwar <rtanwar@...linear.com>
Cc: "bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-lgm-soc <linux-lgm-soc@...linear.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/of: Fix a bug in x86 arch OF support
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:49:04AM +0000, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> On 22/11/2022 5:18 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 03:39:06PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> >
> >> Rahul Tanwar (4):
> >> x86/of: Convert Intel's APIC bindings to YAML schema
> >> x86/of: Introduce new optional bool property for lapic
> >
> > You need properly prefix the first two patches. I guess it's something like
> > "dt-bindings: x86: ioapic:".
> >
>
> Yes, i just checked the git log of devicetree.c and used same prefixes
> here. Thanks for correcting it. I will update it.
Moreover the Cc list in those patches is quite wrong.
I recommend to utilize my "smart" script [1] for sending series.
(You may take an idea from it how to prepare the Cc list close to proper one)
[1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists