[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e63306e0-8cc1-56c5-3600-e95ce4fbd335@maxlinear.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:37:50 +0000
From: Rahul Tanwar <rtanwar@...linear.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-lgm-soc <linux-lgm-soc@...linear.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/of: Convert Intel's APIC bindings to YAML
schema
On 22/11/2022 6:09 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This email was sent from outside of MaxLinear.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:43:12AM +0000, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>> On 22/11/2022 5:11 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 03:39:07PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> > + first appeared in CE4100 SoC. See bindings/x86/ce4100.txt for more
>>>
>>> Shouldn't you change this?
>>
>> Do you mean change compatibility property prefix from
>> "intel,ce4100-ioapic" to "intel,ioapic"? If yes, then i totally agree
>> and i will change it (including new file names & all other references to
>> ce4100). If not, please clarify more..
>
> I specifically emphasized a single line (by putting blank lines around).
> For your convenience I removed the unneeded parts of the context, so you can
> see better what I meant.
>
Got it. I will remove the mention of "See bindings/x86/ce4100.txt" from
here.
> ...
>
>>> > + first appeared in CE4100 SoC. See bindings/x86/ce4100.txt for more
>
>
> Ditto.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists