linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: fix racing conflict of dma_heap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:19:24 -0800
From:   John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, labbott@...hat.com,
        Brian.Starkey@....com, afd@...com, sspatil@...roid.com,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: fix racing conflict of dma_heap_add()

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:24 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dawei,
>
> from the technical description, coding style etc.. it looks clean to me,
> but I'm the completely wrong person to ask for a background check.
>
> I have a high level understanding of how dma-heaps work, but not a
> single line of this code is from me.
>
> Feel free to add my Acked-by, but Laura, John and others do you have any
> opinion?

No objection from me.
Thanks Dawei for submitting this improvement!

Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>

thanks
-john