[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cc1c8a0-7d2c-e653-2ab9-40d040eebbb3@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:31:22 +0100
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing/osnoise: Add osnoise/options file
On 11/24/22 15:50, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
>
> Add the tracing/osnoise/options file to control
> osnoise/timerlat tracer features. It is a single
> file to contain multiple features, similar to
> the sched/features file.
>
> Reading the file displays a list of options. Writing
> the OPTION_NAME enables it, writing NO_OPTION_NAME disables
> it.
>
> The DEAFULTS is a particular option that resets the options
> to the default ones.
>
> It uses a bitmask to keep track of the status of the option. When
> needed, we can add a list of static keys, but for now
> it does not justify the memory increase.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f8d34aefdb225d2603fcb4c02a120832a0cd3339.1668692096.git.bristot@kernel.org
Hi Steve,
Yesterday I sent a v2 of this patch series, adding some more options [1].
But as you already queued these, and as there is no real difference from the
v1 and v2 in these code patches, I think the best way is for me to send a v3
with the additional patches, build on top of the ftrace/core.
(Is it a bad idea? let me know :-))
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1669115208.git.bristot@kernel.org/
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists