linux-kernel - Re: [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing/osnoise: Add osnoise/options file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221124142819.44aeaed2@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:28:19 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing/osnoise: Add osnoise/options
 file

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:31:22 +0100
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,

Hi Daniel,

> 
> Yesterday I sent a v2 of this patch series, adding some more options [1].

Heh, it came in the window of me triaging my patch queue and running my
tests.

> 
> But as you already queued these, and as there is no real difference from the
> v1 and v2 in these code patches, I think the best way is for me to send a v3
> with the additional patches, build on top of the ftrace/core.
> 
> (Is it a bad idea? let me know :-))

Just send patches on top, as these already went through testing, and I
don't want to rebase the branch.

Thanks!

-- Steve