[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y38frY5H5mjCMvDR@wendy>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 07:39:25 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: VMAP_STACK overflow detection thread-safe
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:23:46PM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 06:30:35AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On 24 November 2022 00:50:06 GMT, Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com> wrote:
> > For stack traces, especially long ones, please cut out the timestamps.
> I followed formatting of stack traces in commit 31da94c25ae. Assumed since
> that's merged, that's how test and stack traces should be included in commit
> msg.
>
> I'll follow your suggestion and remove timestamps.
It's just nice for the reader, since the timestamps are pretty much
noise. But it's not a "you must do this", unlike having correct Fixes:
formatting etc.
HTH,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists