[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276F1F9198119DCC97E2F868C0F9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 01:10:55 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [patch V2 13/33] x86/apic/vector: Provide MSI parent domain
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 9:42 PM
>
> On Wed, Nov 23 2022 at 08:16, Kevin Tian wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 10:38 PM
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Mask out the domain specific MSI feature flags which are not
> >> + * supported by the real parent.
> >> + */
> >> + info->flags &= pops->supported_flags;
> >> + /* Enforce the required flags */
> >> + info->flags |=
> >> X86_VECTOR_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED;
> >> +
> >> + /* This is always invoked from the top level MSI domain! */
> >> + info->ops->msi_prepare = x86_msi_prepare;
> >> +
> >> + info->chip->irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent;
> >> + info->chip->irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
> >> + info->chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE |
> >> + IRQCHIP_AFFINITY_PRE_STARTUP;
> >
> > Above are executed twice for both IR and vector after next patch comes.
> > Could skip it for IR.
>
> How so?
>
> +static const struct msi_parent_ops dmar_msi_parent_ops = {
> + .supported_flags = X86_VECTOR_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED |
> MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI,
> + .prefix = "IR-",
> + .init_dev_msi_info = msi_parent_init_dev_msi_info,
> +};
>
> IR delegates the init to its parent domain, i.e. the vector domain. So
> there is no double invocation.
>
oops. How come I read msi_parent_init_dev_msi_info() as
x86_init_dev_msi_info(). 😊
Powered by blists - more mailing lists