lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:12:04 -0800
From:   Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] mm, slub: disable SYSFS support with
 CONFIG_SLUB_TINY

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:11:53PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Currently SLUB enables its sysfs support depending unconditionally on
> the general CONFIG_SYSFS setting. To reduce the configuration
> combination space, make CONFIG_SLUB_TINY disable SLUB's sysfs support by
> reusing the existing SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS define. It is unlikely that
> real tiny systems would combine CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with CONFIG_SYSFS, but
> a randconfig might.

Hm, don't we want to introduce CONFIG_SLAB_SYSFS instead?
I believe many users don't really need it, even if they don't
need CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and they do have CONFIG_SYSFS.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ