lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y39+8mO5oT3K41si@hyeyoo> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:25:54 +0900 From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] mm, slub: don't create kmalloc-rcl caches with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:23:51PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > @@ -859,7 +865,7 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void) > > static void __init > > new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, enum kmalloc_cache_type type, slab_flags_t flags) > > { > > - if (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM) { > > + if ((KMALLOC_RECLAIM != KMALLOC_NORMAL) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) { > > for consistency this can be: > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) { > My finger slipped :) I mean: if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) { -- Thanks, Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists