lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:25:54 +0900
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] mm, slub: don't create kmalloc-rcl caches with
 CONFIG_SLUB_TINY

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:23:51PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > @@ -859,7 +865,7 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void)
> >  static void __init
> >  new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, enum kmalloc_cache_type type, slab_flags_t flags)
> >  {
> > -	if (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM) {
> > +	if ((KMALLOC_RECLAIM != KMALLOC_NORMAL) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) {
> 
> for consistency this can be:
> 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) {
>

My finger slipped :)
I mean:
	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) && (type == KMALLOC_RECLAIM)) {

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ