[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221125100504.5424c3ad@xps-13>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:05:04 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nand tree with the mtd-fixes
tree
Hi Jean,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:46:34 +1100:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nand tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> c717b9b7d6de ("mtd: onenand: omap2: add dependency on GPMC")
>
> from the mtd-fixes tree and commit:
>
> b46ff0780f17 ("mtd: onenand: omap2: Drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
As this commit is not super urgent and because I want to make the merge
process as smooth as possible, I'll drop it from my branches. Please
rebase and resend when -rc1 is out and I'll apply right away.
Thanks Stephen for the report.
Cheers,
Miquèl
>
> from the nand tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists