lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5df9a73-c093-3584-31f4-e2f4f7bd9272@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:06:37 +0100
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        MaĆ­ra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/24] drm/tests: helpers: Create the device in another
 function

On 11/23/22 16:25, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> We'll need in some tests to control when the device needs to be added
> and removed, so let's split the device creation from the DRM device
> creation function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---

[...]

> -static int dev_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *ptr)
> +struct device *drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(struct kunit *test)
>  {
> -	char *name = ptr;
> -	struct device *dev;
> -
> -	dev = root_device_register(name);
> -	if (IS_ERR(dev))
> -		return PTR_ERR(dev);
> -
> -	res->data = dev;
> -	return 0;
> +	return root_device_register(FAKE_DEVICE_NAME);

I was going to ask if a platform device could be used here, to prevent the
issue you mentioned the other day of root_device not having a bus set. But
I see now that you are doing that change in the next patch.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat

Powered by blists - more mailing lists