[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4CVlCgB5eSw03yI@suselix>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:14:44 +0100
From: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>
To: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] blk-iocost: change div64_u64 to
DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP in ioc_refresh_params()
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:06:35PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> vrate_min is calculated by DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP, but vrate_max is calculated
> by div64_u64. Vrate_min may be 1 greater than vrate_max if the input
> values min and max of cost.qos are equal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> ---
> block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>
> diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
> index a38a5324bf10..9030ad8672f3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iocost.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force)
>
> ioc->vrate_min = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MIN] *
> VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION);
> - ioc->vrate_max = div64_u64((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] *
> + ioc->vrate_max = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] *
> VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION);
>
> return true;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Regards,
Andreas
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists