[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4DDsmXU/tkmDfK7@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:31:30 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf build: Fix LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:41:40AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > The tools/lib includes fixes break LIBTRACEVENT_DYNAMIC as the
> > makefile erroneously had depdendencies on building libtraceevent even
> > when not linking with it. This change fixes the issues with
> > LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC by making the built files optional.
>
> It kernel-next on s390 somehow libtraceevent seems to be bypassed, which leads
> to make -C tools/perf install-bin failure. While it does not hit in every
> envoronment, could you please hint what could be a reason for that?
And unless I am missing something install-traceevent-plugins target
is only awailable when LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC is undefined..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists