[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wn7hublo.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:46:59 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] irqchip: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 21:13:51 +0000,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
>
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
>
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
> Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.
>
> The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().
>
> You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
> at [1].
>
>
> This patch has NOT been compile tested.
Thanks for having the honesty to state that this hasn't been even
compile tested. However, and for fairly obvious reason, I will not
take such patches.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists