lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87wn7hublo.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:46:59 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] irqchip: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool() On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 21:13:51 +0000, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote: > > strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool(). > However, the latter is more used within the kernel. > > In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to > the other function name. > > While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>) > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> > --- > This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool(). > Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones. > > The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool(). > > You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available > at [1]. > > > This patch has NOT been compile tested. Thanks for having the honesty to state that this hasn't been even compile tested. However, and for fairly obvious reason, I will not take such patches. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists