[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8n1ubbj.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:53:04 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip: LoongArch: Select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK if SMP
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 04:39:09 +0100,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> An IRQ's effective affinity can only be different from its configured
> affinity if there are multiple CPUs. Make it clear that this option is
> only meaningful when SMP is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>
> v2: rebased on 6.1-rc2
>
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 7ef9f5e..8461915 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ config IRQ_LOONGARCH_CPU
> bool
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> - select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
> + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK if SMP
> select LOONGSON_LIOINTC
> select LOONGSON_EIOINTC
> select LOONGSON_PCH_PIC
We already have this:
# Supports effective affinity mask
config GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
depends on SMP
bool
Do we really need to express this for every interrupt controller?
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists