linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RDMA/srp: Fix error return code in srp_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:19:07 +0800
From:   wangyufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <bvanassche@....org>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <leon@...nel.org>,
        <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bart.vanassche@....com>, <easwar.hariharan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RDMA/srp: Fix error return code in
 srp_parse_options()



在 2022/11/26 20:02, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 11:35:04AM +0800, Wang Yufen wrote:
>> In the previous while loop, "ret" may be assigned zero, , so the error
>> return code may be incorrectly set to 0 instead of -EINVAL.
>> Add out_with_einval goto label and covert all "goto out;" to "goto
>> out_with_einval:" where it's appropriate, alse investigate each case
>> separately as Andy suggessted.
> 
> It's better now, though you missed something...
> 
> ...
> 
>>   		case SRP_OPT_TARGET_CAN_QUEUE:
>> -			if (match_int(args, &token) || token < 1) {
>> +			ret = match_int(args, &token);
> 
> Check for ret?

Yes, there's a ret check missing here, will change in v3

> 
>> +			if (token < 1) {
>>   				pr_warn("bad max target_can_queue parameter '%s'\n",
>>   					p);
>> -				goto out;
>> +				goto out_with_einval;
>>   			}
>>   			target->target_can_queue = token;
>>   			break;
> 
> ...
> 
>>   			target->scsi_host->can_queue);
> 
> The below can't be like this, right?

Yes, I'm sorry for the breakage, also will change in v3
Thanks!

> 
>> +out_with_einval:
>> +	ret = -EINVAL;
>>   out:
>>   	kfree(options);
>>   	return ret;
>