[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4bb4aa5-08cc-4a4d-76cf-46bda5c6de59@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:04:56 +0800
From: "Ziyang Xuan (William)" <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
<sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>
CC: <gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<naveenm@...vell.com>, <rsaladi2@...vell.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] octeontx2-pf: Fix possible memory leak in
otx2_probe()
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:56:43AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
>> In otx2_probe(), there are several possible memory leak bugs
>> in exception paths as follows:
>> 1. Do not release pf->otx2_wq when excute otx2_init_tc() failed.
>> 2. Do not shutdown tc when excute otx2_register_dl() failed.
>> 3. Do not unregister devlink when initialize SR-IOV failed.
>>
>> Fixes: 1d4d9e42c240 ("octeontx2-pf: Add tc flower hardware offload on ingress traffic")
>> Fixes: 2da489432747 ("octeontx2-pf: devlink params support to set mcam entry count")
>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>> index 303930499a4c..8d7f2c3b0cfd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>> @@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ static int otx2_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>
>> err = otx2_register_dl(pf);
>> if (err)
>> - goto err_mcam_flow_del;
>> + goto err_register_dl;
>>
>> /* Initialize SR-IOV resources */
>> err = otx2_sriov_vfcfg_init(pf);
>> @@ -2919,8 +2919,11 @@ static int otx2_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> return 0;
>
> If otx2_dcbnl_set_ops() fails at the end then shouldn't we also call
> otx2_sriov_vfcfg_cleanup() ?
I think it does not need. This is the probe process. PF and VF are all not ready to work,
so pf->vf_configs[i].link_event_work does not scheduled. And pf->vf_configs memory resource will
be freed by devm subsystem if probe failed. There are not memory leak and other problems.
@Sunil Goutham, Please help to confirm.
Thanks.
>
>>
>> err_pf_sriov_init:
>> + otx2_unregister_dl(pf);
>> +err_register_dl:
>> otx2_shutdown_tc(pf);
>> err_mcam_flow_del:
>> + destroy_workqueue(pf->otx2_wq);
>> otx2_mcam_flow_del(pf);
>> err_unreg_netdev:
>> unregister_netdev(netdev);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists