[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8b08514-1d5c-ee21-b74f-5919d8ab5dfa@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 10:22:32 +0800
From: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: guro@...com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, tj@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression
Hi, Roman
We also found the same regression of hackbench.throughput in our
kernel-5.10, likes described in [1].
It seems that the mail thread in [2] doesn't show the last solution. So
I wonder whether the upstream already has fix patch or solution can help
us to solve this regression.
Thanks!
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210114025151.GA22932@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/.
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YCcp7pwzlQy15v5H@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com/#R
Powered by blists - more mailing lists