linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: amlogic: align LED node names with dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3b7e1f0-16cb-4284-c740-5b5874612ea4@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:33:40 +0100
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: amlogic: align LED node names with dtschema


Le 27/11/2022 à 13:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> On 26/11/2022 17:03, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>>> Aren't you maintainer of the platform? This means I should take care of
>>>> this patch?
>>> Ah, this will be picked up by Kevin or Jerome? So this tag means only
>>> Reviewer's statement of oversight, right?
>> Of course I'll pick it.
>>
> So that's confusing to see Review which does not mean review, but
> maintainer pick...

Reviewed-by means reviewed, there's no confusion here, the significance
is clearly documented on https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html

>
> Reviewed-by means, I should take your tag and add to v2 or the
> maintainer will add it when picking up.

Reviewed-by means reviewed, fully reviewed patches are ready to
be picked unless a change is asked by a reviewer.

Decision to pick or not a patch does not depend on any tags, but
is the sole decision of the maintainer adding it's Signed-off-by.

While I use Acked-by to signify acceptance to other maintainers
on files I authored or files I maintain but cannot pick, here I don't
need to signify acceptance to myself.

Neil

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>