[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wn7f5nwt.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:17:06 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga
<ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
"~postmarketos\/upstreaming\@lists.sr.ht"
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
"martin.botka\@somainline.org" <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno\@somainline.org"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
"marijn.suijten\@somainline.org" <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
"jamipkettunen\@somainline.org" <jamipkettunen@...ainline.org>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
"Zhao\, Jiaqing" <jiaqing.zhao@...el.com>,
"Russell King \(Oracle\)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Soon Tak Lee <soontak.lee@...ress.com>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"brcm80211-dev-list.pdl\@broadcom.com"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
"SHA-cyfmac-dev-list\@infineon.com"
<SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Add support for BCM43596 PCIe Wi-Fi
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> writes:
>> >> Instead of a directory path ("brcm/brcmfmac43596-pcie") why not provide
>> >> just the chipset name ("brcmfmac43596-pcie")? IMHO it's unnecessary to
>> >> have directory names in Device Tree.
>> >
>> > I think it's common practice to include a full $FIRMWARE_DIR-relative
>> > path when specifying firmware in DT, though here I left out the board
>> > name bit as that's assigned dynamically anyway. That said, if you don't
>> > like it, I can change it.
>>
>> It's just that I have understood that Device Tree is supposed to
>> describe hardware and to me a firmware directory "brcm/" is a software
>> property, not a hardware property. But this is really for the Device
>> Tree maintainers to decide, they know this best :)
>
> I would personally just minimize the amount of information
> put into the device tree to be exactly what is needed to find
> the right firmware.
>
> brcm,firmware-compatible = "43596";
>
> since the code already knows how to conjure the rest of the string.
FWIW I like this.
> But check with Rob/Krzysztof.
Indeed, they are the experts here.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists