linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] hwmon: (max6639) Add pwm support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3faaa168-9802-9773-aa10-ee8ff0447d97@9elements.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:25:28 +0530
From:   Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] hwmon: (max6639) Add pwm support

Hi

On 29-11-2022 10:11 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/29/22 08:34, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>>> Add pwm support for max6639. Also configure pwm fan speed based on pwm
>>> provided in DT.
>>
>> Did you do anything to resolve the questions I had in reply to v5? If
>> yes, I must have missed it.
I did split the patch to separate dt changes & pwm specific changes.
>>
> 
> I don't see a response to my concerns either, especially regarding fan mode
> (dc vs. pwm) in the bindings. For that reason, I won't even look at the 
> series.

I intend to use max6639 driver but with DT support.
Did additional changes(like using PWM provider) based on feedback I 
received.

> 
> Guenter
> 
>> Note that maintainer time is scarce and with sending new versions of a
>> patch with no sign that you improved in the aspects that were critized
>> before, you're burning that scarce time and loosing the good will of the
>> responsible maintainers.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Uwe
>>
> 
Regards,
Naresh