[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <979d220c-525c-ad57-89b8-b65bda55fe55@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:51:34 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: rockchip-dwmac: add rk3568 xpcs
compatible
On 29/11/2022 09:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 08:27, Chukun Pan wrote:
>> The gmac of RK3568 supports RGMII/SGMII/QSGMII interface.
>> This patch adds a compatible string for the required clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml
>> index 42fb72b6909d..36b1e82212e7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ properties:
>> - mac_clk_rx
>> - aclk_mac
>> - pclk_mac
>> + - pclk_xpcs
>> - clk_mac_ref
>> - clk_mac_refout
>> - clk_mac_speed
>> @@ -90,6 +91,11 @@ properties:
>> The phandle of the syscon node for the peripheral general register file.
>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>
>> + rockchip,xpcs:
>> + description:
>> + The phandle of the syscon node for the peripheral general register file.
>
> You used the same description as above, so no, you cannot have two
> properties which are the same. syscons for GRF are called
> "rockchip,grf", aren't they?
Also:
1. Your commit msg does not explain it at all.
2. Your driver code uses this as some phy? Don't use syscon as
workaround for missing drivers.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists