[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221129092546.62895-1-korantwork@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 17:25:46 +0800
From: korantwork@...il.com
To: dave.hansen@...el.com, luto@...nel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Xinghui Li <korantli@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix the code style issue about "foo* bar"
From: Xinghui Li <korantli@...cent.com>
Fix the error:
'ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
688: FILE: arch/x86/mm/fault.c:688:
+ call_on_stack(__this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF) - sizeof(void*),'
reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xinghui Li <korantli@...cent.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 7b0d4ab894c8..3f014cdd85f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ page_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
* and then double-fault, though, because we're likely to
* break the console driver and lose most of the stack dump.
*/
- call_on_stack(__this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF) - sizeof(void*),
+ call_on_stack(__this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF) - sizeof(void *),
handle_stack_overflow,
ASM_CALL_ARG3,
, [arg1] "r" (regs), [arg2] "r" (address), [arg3] "r" (&info));
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists