lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:15:57 +0000 From: "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> CC: "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@....com>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ABI: sysfs-class-hwmon: add a description for fanY_fault > This change is really completely unrelated to a CPLD or specific SoC. > The commit description is just confusing. It should simply state that > it documents the existing fanX_fault attribute. Understood. Just to confirm should I change fanY_fault to fanX_fault in documentation as well as the patch description? For instance: /sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX/fanX_fault It seems that the documentation around it uses fanY_ format. Thanks, -Nick Hawkins
Powered by blists - more mailing lists