linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Remove unneeded io-mapping.h #include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4baEGvozPhBlUZw@fedora>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:20:32 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Remove unneeded io-mapping.h #include

On 28 Nov 10:27, Pavan Chebbi wrote:
>Though I think having the target tree specified conventionally in the
>subject line [PATCH net] would be more complying with the process.

For such cleanup patches I think [PATCH net-next] is better.

[...]

>>
>> Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>

Thanks you Pavan & Christophe
applied to net-next-mlx5 will be sent to net-next shortly