[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4atwmYQOV0cZ4n6@zx2c4.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 02:11:30 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO
implementation
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:52:05PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29 2022 at 22:06, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hook up the generic vDSO implementation to the x86 vDSO data page. Since
> > the existing vDSO infrastructure is heavily based on the timekeeping
> > functionality, which works over arrays of bases, a new macro is
> > introduced for vvars that are not arrays.
> >
> > The vDSO function requires a ChaCha20 implementation that does not write
> > to the stack, yet can still do an entire ChaCha20 permutation, so
> > provide this using SSE2, since this is userland code that must work on
> > all x86-64 processors.
>
> Way more consumable and looks about right.
Good.
> Please take your time and
> give others a chance to look at this lot before rushing out v11.
That's my plan indeed. Now that the patch is reviewable, I'll let it sit
for a while. In between v10 and v11, my scratch work will be in
<https://git.zx2c4.com/linux-rng/log/?h=vdso>, which is rebased often.
Thanks again for looking this over.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists