[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mt89te77.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 02:37:32 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] random: add vgetrandom_alloc() syscall
On Wed, Nov 30 2022 at 01:59, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:02:29PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > + * Returns a pointer to the first state in the allocation.
>>
>> I have serious doubts that this statement is correct.
>
> "Returns the address of the first state in the allocation" is better I
> guess.
Does not even come close to correct.
As my previous hint of 'using this as template for the (hint:missing)
man page' did not work well, may I suggest that you look at the various
return statements in that function and validate whether your proposed
return value documentation is valid for all of them?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists