linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] pxa: Remove dev_err() after platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m25yevf0ph.fsf@free.fr>
Date:   Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:15:34 +0100
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     zhang.songyi@....com.cn
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, lkundrak@...sk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] pxa: Remove dev_err() after platform_get_irq()


<zhang.songyi@....com.cn> writes:

> From: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>
>
> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to 
> print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the 
> platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to 
> display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.
>
> /drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c:150:2-9: line 150 is redundant because
> platform_get_irq() already prints an error
>
> Signed-off-by: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c b/drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c
> index 93449fb3519e..7085901b4e4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/pxa/ssp.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static int pxa_ssp_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>
>         ssp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>         if (ssp->irq < 0) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "no IRQ resource defined\n");
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
As you're leaving only one statement in the if, you should drop 
the braces as well.

Other than that, it looks good :
Reviewed-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>

Cheers.

--
Robert