[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJEYhTFsF8vqe6enE7d107HfXZvgxN=iLGQj21sx9gwcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:38:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Bob Gilligan <gilligan@...sta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] net/tcp: Disable TCP-MD5 static key on
tcp_md5sig_info destruction
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:39 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> To do that, separate two scenarios:
> - where it's the first MD5 key on the system, which means that enabling
> of the static key may need to sleep;
> - copying of an existing key from a listening socket to the request
> socket upon receiving a signed TCP segment, where static key was
> already enabled (when the key was added to the listening socket).
>
> Now the life-time of the static branch for TCP-MD5 is until:
> - last tcp_md5sig_info is destroyed
> - last socket in time-wait state with MD5 key is closed.
>
> Which means that after all sockets with TCP-MD5 keys are gone, the
> system gets back the performance of disabled md5-key static branch.
>
> While at here, provide static_key_fast_inc() helper that does ref
> counter increment in atomic fashion (without grabbing cpus_read_lock()
> on CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y). This is needed to add a new user for
> a static_key when the caller controls the lifetime of another user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists