linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/289] 6.0.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4hQVCBYfwU0abvO@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:57:24 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/289] 6.0.11-rc1 review

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:44:53AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 00:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.11 release.
> > There are 289 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:05:05 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.11-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> Regressions found on x86_64:
> 
>     - build-clang-15-allmodconfig-x86_64
>     - build-clang-nightly-allmodconfig-x86_64
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
>     bpf: Convert BPF_DISPATCHER to use static_call() (not ftrace)
>     [ Upstream commit c86df29d11dfba27c0a1f5039cd6fe387fbf4239 ]
> 
> Causing the following build warnings / errors with clang-15 allmodconfig
> on x86_64,
> 
> Build error:
> make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8
> O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/build LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
> ARCH=x86_64 SRCARCH=x86 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu-
> 'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache clang'
> kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c:126:33: error: pointer type mismatch ('void *'
> and 'unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct bpf_insn *,
> bpf_func_t)' (aka 'unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct
> bpf_insn *, unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct bpf_insn
> *))')) [-Werror,-Wpointer-type-mismatch]
>         __BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE(d, new ?: &bpf_dispatcher_nop_func);
>                                    ~~~ ^  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/bpf.h:938:54: note: expanded from macro '__BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE'
>         __static_call_update((_d)->sc_key, (_d)->sc_tramp, (_new))
>                                                             ^~~~
> 1 error generated.

Thanks for the report! This is fixed with upstream commit a679120edfcf
("bpf: Add explicit cast to 'void *' for __BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE()"),
which was marked as a fix for c86df29d11df.

Cheers,
Nathan