linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/289] 6.0.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuJVxhKbeN9OGCr2_zyfa1k3j4DS1gAoTW0P89Eyz2FHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:44:53 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/289] 6.0.11-rc1 review

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 00:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.11 release.
> There are 289 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:05:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.11-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
Regressions found on x86_64:

    - build-clang-15-allmodconfig-x86_64
    - build-clang-nightly-allmodconfig-x86_64

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

    bpf: Convert BPF_DISPATCHER to use static_call() (not ftrace)
    [ Upstream commit c86df29d11dfba27c0a1f5039cd6fe387fbf4239 ]

Causing the following build warnings / errors with clang-15 allmodconfig
on x86_64,

Build error:
make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8
O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/build LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
ARCH=x86_64 SRCARCH=x86 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu-
'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache clang'
kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c:126:33: error: pointer type mismatch ('void *'
and 'unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct bpf_insn *,
bpf_func_t)' (aka 'unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct
bpf_insn *, unsigned int (*)(const void *, const struct bpf_insn
*))')) [-Werror,-Wpointer-type-mismatch]
        __BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE(d, new ?: &bpf_dispatcher_nop_func);
                                   ~~~ ^  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:938:54: note: expanded from macro '__BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE'
        __static_call_update((_d)->sc_key, (_d)->sc_tramp, (_new))
                                                            ^~~~
1 error generated.

Build logs:
  - https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2IHYTj6JN108YShWQ8K8Fd0HyVW/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org