lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:06:55 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, Artur Bujdoso <artur.bujdoso@...il.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>, "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sc.suh@...sung.com, taehyun.cho@...sung.com, jh0801.jung@...sung.com, eomji.oh@...sung.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] usb: host: add xhci-exynos to support Exynos SOCs On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:31AM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote: > This driver works with xhci platform driver. It needs to override > functions of xhci_plat_hc_driver. Wakelocks are used for sleep/wakeup > scenario of system. So this means that no other platform xhci driver can be supported in the same system at the same time. Which kind of makes sense as that's not anything a normal system would have, BUT it feels very odd. This whole idea of "override the platform driver" feels fragile, why not make these just real platform drivers and have the xhci platform code be a library that the other ones can use? That way you have more control overall, right? thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists