linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Improved usability of the Makefile in libbpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZ8z9yKwkbQthaNPR9HJDqq77EJwHaEqqwQ3qYjKWTRAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:42:09 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
Cc:     andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yanan@...wei.com,
        wuchangye@...wei.com, xiesongyang@...wei.com,
        kongweibin2@...wei.com, zhangmingyi5@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improved usability of the Makefile in libbpf

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:42 PM Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Current libbpf Makefile does not contain the help command, which
> is inconvenient to use. A help command is provided to list the
> commands supported by libbpf make and the functions of the commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> index 4c904ef0b47e..c86e05df4711 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -286,3 +286,37 @@ tags:
>
>  # Delete partially updated (corrupted) files on error
>  .DELETE_ON_ERROR:
> +
> +help:
> +       @echo 'Default targets:'
> +       @echo '  all               - Run all_cmd'
> +       @echo '  all_cmd           - Build library and pkgconfig, check abi and version info'
> +       @echo ''
> +       @echo 'Cleaning targets:'
> +       @echo '  clean             - Remove all generated files'
> +       @echo ''
> +       @echo 'Build targets:'
> +       @echo '  libbpf.so         - Build the dynamic library'
> +       @echo '  libbpf.a          - Build the static library'
> +       @echo '  libbpf.pc         - Build the pkgconfig file'
> +       @echo ''
> +       @echo 'Install targets:'
> +       @echo '  install           - Install all headers, library and pkgconfig file to'
> +       @echo '                      DESTDIR(default: /) with prefix(default: /usr/local)'
> +       @echo '  install_lib       - Install only library'
> +       @echo '  install_headers   - Install only headers'
> +       @echo '  install_pkgconfig - Install only pkgconfig file'
> +       @echo ''
> +       @echo 'Other generic targets:'
> +       @echo '  cscope            - Generate cscope index'
> +       @echo '  tags              - Generate tags file for editors'
> +       @echo '  check             - Check abi and version info'
> +       @echo '  check_abi         - Check versioned symbols'
> +       @echo '  check_version     - Check whether the libbpf version defined in libbpf_version.h'
> +       @echo '                      is the same as that defined in libbpf.map'
> +       @echo ''
> +       @echo '  make V=0|1             [targets] 0 => quiet build (default), 1 => verbose build'
> +       @echo '  make DESTDIR=/root     [install targets] use DESTDIR for installing'
> +       @echo '                                           into a different root directory'
> +       @echo '  make prefix=/path      [install targets] use prefix for installing'
> +       @echo '                                           into a user defined prefix path'


I'm a bit hesitant about adding all this. Most of those targets are
not intended to be used directly, only "all", "clean", and "install"
are supposed to be used by end-users (maybe also "install_headers").
And those seems to be pretty typical and straightforward targets.

I actually didn't even know about `make help`, but I checked perf's
`make help` and it's way more succinct, let's try modeling it here?

Also, please use [PATCH bpf-next] (with v2 in between them) for next
submission to point that this is meant for bpf-next tree.


> --
> 2.33.0
>